Corvette Z06 DOHC V8 Uses A Trick Intake To Produce Gobs Of Torque

[ad_1]

As the world heads into Super Bowl Sunday, here’s a little science content to impress your friends at the Big Game gathering. Every car enthusiast knows that the 2023 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 has the most powerful V8 engine ever used in a production car. The flat-plane crankshaft design with sky-high peak horsepower certainly catches the eye, but the clever intake manifold gives the LT6 V8 usable power throughout the rev range.

For the record, the 5.5-liter DOHC engine in the new Z06 makes 670 hp (500 kilowatts) at 8,400 rpm – just 200 revs below the 8,600 rpm limit. This is an impressive peak power for a factory without forced induction which also meet emission standards, but in real-world applications such high numbers don’t necessarily mean a pleasant life on the streets. An article from SAE International highlights the LT6’s split intake manifold and internal runners as reasons why the engine pumps out a solid 460 pound-feet (624 Newton-meters) of torque at 6,300 rpm, but also delivers a flat curve for low rpm muscle.

We’re not going to dive deep into techno-speak. In short, the intake utilizes the Helmholtz resonance which effectively increases the pressure in the manifold. This is moderated through the use of three valves that can open and close at different rpm points, optimizing airflow over different ranges to deliver more power. Two valves remain closed at up to 2,000 rpm, with a third opening at 5,800 rpm. The result is an engine that technically reaches peak torque at 6,300 rpm, but still offers the majority of those revs at lower revs. Bottom line, the LT6 V8 has some peak torque.

Optimizing engine airflow for low-end power in a high-rpm engine isn’t a new concept, but Chevrolet engineers have definitely taken it to the extreme with the LT6 V8. We can’t wait to sample this science for ourselves later this year when we get behind the wheel for the first drive of our Corvette Z06 2023. Stay here.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply